id810611771
If we accept that not all limitations of freedom from interference are unjust, but we also think freedom from interference is extremely important, what principle should we use to decide how much of it everyone gets? In some cases, like freedom of speech, a plausible answer might be that it shouldn’t be limited at all. Everyone should be able to express any opinion.
✏️ questions
Link to original
This does come up a lot in my conversations with Faisal. How do you reconcile everyone having freedom, with some liberties trotting upon other’s liberties?
Everyone can have as much freedom that’s compatible with everyone else having just as much freedom of their own.
🔗 View Highlight